Report | Journalist Blasts California Commission For Multiple Counts Of Fraudulent Activity
MMA Journalist Zach Arnold has been very thorough in his investigation of the Nevada State Athletic Commission. So much so that he believes he has uncovered multiple counts of fraud being conducted by the State’s regulatory body.
Through his website at fightopinion.com he dishes out all the ugly details in what can only be described as grossly negligent activity if true.
Check it out:
[box_light]The California State Athletic Commission is openly losing & manipulating fighter paperwork
When we last checked in about the California State Athletic Commission and the Department of Consumer Affairs, we discussed how the â€ś3 inspector policyâ€ť at California combat sports shows is creating havoc as far as enforcing issues connected to health & safety. With the few inspectors on the ground at shows not enforcing the rules or regulations, chaos has ensued and cheating is exploding.
A few days before that article, we wrote an extensive prediction article regarding what state auditors would find once they start digging into the activities in the Sacramento office of CSAC. Not only would auditors likely discover that most inspectors working for the commission canâ€™t manage a box office (costing the state upwards in 7 figures of missing revenue), they canâ€™t even manage basic rules of safety for fighters who participate at shows throughout the state of California. If you canâ€™t run a box office and you canâ€™t ensure the health & safety of the competitors, whatâ€™s the point of your existence?
The Department of Consumer Affairs, led by Denise Brown and Awet Kidane, acknowledge that fraud is taking place under their noses and are refusing to fix the situation. They refuse to fire the individuals involved in shady & criminal activity. Workers in the CSAC front office no longer take any threats seriously and reportedly are laughing off any sort of analysis about their execrable behavior.
Is there anything that might change the mood of the powers-that-be at Consumer Affairs? Yes, when state auditors discover what we just discovered in research regarding the way the Sacramento office manages & processes licensing and medical paperwork for fighters.
Because the CSAC front office neglects to audit event packages mailed to them by inspectors after events, they are not properly ensuring that receipts for licensee applications are being collected. They are also neglecting to check the medical & licensing paperwork. Furthermore, the front office is not auditing the box office to make sure that the commission is receiving the money it is supposed to be getting from promoters.
This toxic mix of negligence has resulted in utter chaos at the California State Athletic Commission. It has directly resulted in missing paperwork that should be on file. While some documents are scanned in and available to access, many documents are flat out missing. Theyâ€™re gone. Misplaced, lost, thrown away. If a CEO of a respectable corporation took one look at the way paperwork is managed in the Sacramento office, they would immediately assume the worst of the individuals in the office. You can only be so incompetent before you are suspected of behavior that is borderline criminal.
Especially if you are trying to replace missing medical & licensing paperwork and attempting to cover your tracks in the process.
There are many forms that a fighter must fill out and get completed before they are legally allowed to fight in the state of California. You can see the list of forms here, which includes a licensing application, MRI summary, neurological examination, EKG summary, eye exam, physical exam, and lab work for HIV testing.
However, thereâ€™s a two-pronged problem. First, the lead inspectors who are out in the field at shows are not enforcing the rules & regulations on the books. They are sometimes not sending the required paperwork in the event package back to Sacramento after shows. Second, this problem is exacerbated by the fact that the front office doesnâ€™t audit the event packages. The end result is a mess of the paperwork process where some fighters have their documentation on file while other fighters do not. Fighters have already paid money or had money deducted from their fight purse to take care of costs. The costs, especially on MRI testing, can really hit the wallet hard of fighters who are competing on small to mid-sized shows in the state.
The end result of the behavior from both lead inspectors & the CSAC front office is gross negligence that would never be tolerated in a standard office environment. During our research into this topic, we discovered that the percentage of documents lost on fighters by the front office or lead inspectors was shockingly high.
In order to understand what the lead inspectors are facing, it is important to understand what the front office is presenting them in the event packages. There is a sheet in the packet called a Whoâ€™s Who sheet where the proposed fights on a card are listed. There are categories such as the status of a fighterâ€™s Federal ID, application status, fees paid, picture on file, and whether or not the fighter in question has completed medical records on file. It will either say â€śOKâ€ť and have a date of the specific medical file or it will say the word â€śneedâ€ť in red.
In documents we examined regarding Whoâ€™s Who sheets, we discovered that there are instances where the sheets contain instructions in bold lettering to the lead inspector. The instructions to the lead inspector can involve asking the fighter to produce a copy of certain medical paperwork (like an eye exam). The instructions can also issue a directive to the lead inspector to get a fighter to fill out another licensing application formâ€¦ and back-date it.
Let me repeat what I just wrote. Back-dating paperwork. As in falsifying and manipulating documents so that the ones on file appear to have been process on a certain date but were really processed on another date.
On the Whoâ€™s Who sheet, the CSAC front office has put â€” in writing, no less â€” a request to the lead inspector to ask the fighter in question to produce a hard copy of the exam results. However, what if the fighter doesnâ€™t know that the front office has lost the document and is asked on short notice to produce a hard copy that they donâ€™t have? The fighter (or promoter or agent) has to then pay out of pocket to do a new exam so that a new hard copy is created and then given to the lead inspector at the show if they want to fight. This scenario is not uncommon at shows.
Throughout the documentation weâ€™ve reviewed, there are 100s of fighters that CSAC lists as having some sort of missing medical paperwork. A combination of complete negligence on the behalf of both lead inspectors at events to send in the proper medical paperwork in the event packages back to Sacramento along with the Sacramento front office refusing to audit event packages and use common sense to manage medical records has created a dangerous & reckless atmosphere. How can anyone trust their medical records to be kept safe with the Department of Consumer Affairs? You simply canâ€™t.
It would be one thing for a commission office to lose some paperwork. It would be one thing for a commission office to ask for fighters to produce documentation that is missing and just label such a transaction with a truthful date. However, that is not what is going on here in the CSAC front office. The front office is asking lead inspectors on the ground to change the date on paperwork in order to cover the asses of those who are screwing up big time in Sacramento. Incredibly, all of these requests to manipulate & change the date on paperwork IS IN WRITING. If state auditors took one look at the event packages for shows that have been prepared by the CSAC front office, they would be terrified at what is listed in writing on the Whoâ€™s Who sheets. When I saw what was in writing on Whoâ€™s Who sheets, I was taken aback by what I saw.
Why donâ€™t the front office workers at the California State Athletic Commission give a damn about their shady activity? Because everything is a joke to the front office. There are no consequences. Nobody in the Department of Consumer Affairs has fired anyone. Denise Brown is the same individual that has known fraud has been ongoing at the commission and even put this admission in writing.
When no one in the Department of Consumer Affairs is willing to actually fire the individuals involved in screwing up box offices & costing the state of California upwards of 7 figures, why should the front office care?
When no one in the Department of Consumer Affairs is willing to fire the individuals involved in altering the dates on documents and misplacing or losing sensitive medical paperwork, why should the front office care?
What we have is a toxic mess on our hands in Sacramento that is pushing out fighters and promoters being active in the state of California. Business is heading to other states as a direct result of the behavior from the Department of Consumer Affairs.
If you think that altering medical records is a crime, thatâ€™s because it is. All one needs to do is to take a look at the Penal Code section of California state law that pertains to manipulating documents for insurance purposes and apply the same law here. California PC 471.5 states the following:
Any person who alters or modifies the medical record of any person, with fraudulent intent, or who, with fraudulent intent, creates any false medical record, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
So, why is back-dating of documents such as licensing applications not considered a serious offense by those working at CSAC? Their loophole & reasoning is based on the concept that licensing paperwork is not medical documentation, therefore they arenâ€™t altering medical documents. Which begs us to ask the question â€” if losing documents such as licensing applications is not criminal activity, then why are you trying to alter the dates of these types of documents?
Curiously, why are you not only altering the dates of documents but also putting such requests in writing and instructing others to do your dirty work? That, in and of itself, shows how brazen the Sacramento CSAC office is that they are willing to put their own admissions of guilt in writing.
Letâ€™s just focus on the altering of dates on licensing applications for a second and not other issues related to missing medical paperwork. If a fighter was seriously injured and sued the state of California for negligenceâ€¦ and it was discovered by lawyers that the fighterâ€™s license in question was somehow manipulated (e.g. back-dated) because some of the dates on the medical documentation had expiredâ€¦ how could the commission not be found guilty based on issues of strict liability? Furthermore, how would a jury not consider modification and manipulation of a fighterâ€™s licensing application relevant given that the license is the key for anyone who wants to fight in the state of California? The license and medical paperwork go hand-in-hand.
I brought up the possibility of modifying licensing paperwork (e.g. back-dating) as a way to get around a fighter having some expired medical records. Consider the following: an application/fee lasts 1 year, the neurological exam documention lasts 15 months, the MRI & MRI summary documentation lasts 1 year plus a second year at the discretion of a fight doctor, the eye exam & physical exam last 1 year, and the blood work (lab documentation) last 6 months in duration and must be done within 30 days of the fighter application being filled out.
See how easy it is to play Russian Roulette here when youâ€™re back-dating and altering documents?
It should also be noted that when Sacramento loses the licensing documentation for a fighter, they canâ€™t punish a fighter for a failed drug test or another kind of suspension if the fighter isnâ€™t technically licensed.
The truth is that missing paperwork issues for fighters should be taken care of by the Sacramento office 30 days prior to an event happening. This is never done. The fact that you have the CSAC front office instructing lead inspectors to take care of missing medical paperwork & back-dating documentation at the weigh-ins of shows reveals just what a chaotic mess the state has on its hands.
Now, throw in the â€ś3 inspector policyâ€ť per show. If you have 3 inspectors working a show, the likelihood of: a) managing the box office, b) handling basic drug testing (drugs of abuse only for most shows now), c) inspecting hand-wraps and gloves to make sure there arenâ€™t illegal hand-wraps and skinning of gloves (or both fighters using the same size of gloves), and d) properly handling medical paperwork is about 1% right now in terms of actually doing the job right. It simply cannot be done given who is currently working as inspectors on the ground. Itâ€™s just not going to happen.
A message to the media and to politicians
We have staffers & politicians from the California Legislature who are reading our reports about the athletic commission. Here is some advice for these individuals, espeically if you are connected to the state Senateâ€™s Business & Professions Committeeâ€¦
Put everyone connected to the California State Athletic Commisison under oath and under penalty of perjury. Put the top lead inspectors for the commission (such as Mohammad Noor & Mike Guzman) under oath. Video tape the hearing for the California Channel. Grill them.
Put Denise Brown & Awet Kidane from the Department of Consumer Affairs under oath and grill them as to why they wonâ€™t file any notices of adverse actions to terminate CSAC employees. Why wonâ€™t they fire front office workers they know are committing fraud? DCA has put this admission in writing. They canâ€™t run away from it. Make them answer why they wonâ€™t fire anyone.
Sunsetting the commission will simply exacerbate the problems that already exist at the California State Athletic Commisison. The best tactic for SBP is to put everyone under oath and put their statements on video tape. Watch them squirm.
As for the combat sports media (both boxing & MMA), start going to shows in California and put lead inspectors on the record. Che Guevara is going to be the lead inspector for the Andre Ward/Chad Dawson fight in Oakland. Heâ€™ll be at the weigh-ins on Friday and running the show at Oracle Arena on Saturday. Grill him.
Either the mess in Sacramento gets cleaned up now voluntarily or gets cleaned up after the state of California loses millions of dollars because of lawsuits & criminal charges. Iâ€™d rather have this mess cleaned up right now before someone gets seriously hurt or killed due to the glaring negligence of individuals in the California State Athletic Commission office who think everything is a big joke.
2 Responses to “Report | Journalist Blasts California Commission For Multiple Counts Of Fraudulent Activity”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.