As you know, the BJJ Pan-American Championships and Mundials(world championships) have belt divisions. If a blue belt competes in the Mundials, they will tell him, “Since you are a blue belt, you do not have to go up against purple, brown, or black belts”. In other words, he is protected from fighting certain opponents based on the opponents having higher rank. If the blue belt Mundial competitor wins, then he is technically a “world champion” on paper. But in my opinion, he would not really be a true “world champion” in the strictest sense of the words. To me, the idea of a world champion means that you are the best in the world, regardless of belt rank. It means that you were not protected from fighting any opponent due to that opponent having more rank. In that sense, only the black belt world championship is a true world championship in the strictest sense of the words. In that division, a competitor is not “protected” from fighting any other competitor due to the other fighter having more rank. A blue belt world champion is “protected” from competing against other fighters based on the other competitor having more rank. To have a blue belt, purple belt, or brown belt world champion is, in a way, watering down the title of “world champion”. The same applies to the Pan-American Championships.
In Olympic judo, there are no belt rank divisions. A judoka who competes in Olympic judo must be willing to compete against any other player regardless of belt rank. Therefore, he is not “protected” from competing against another fighter based on the other fighter having more rank. A judo brown belt who qualifies for the Olympics must be willing to fight against judo black belts. Therefore, the judoka who wins the Olympics is really the best judo fighter in the world, not just in his belt division. He really is like a true world champion, in the that sense.
I think that in principle, the Mundials and BJJ Pan-Ams should be run the same way. They should either have only a black belt division, or have no belt rank divisions. That way, a competitor of the world championships is not “protected” from fighting any opponent based on the opponent having higher belt rank. It really would be a matter of “fighting anyone, anytime.” There would be no blue, purple, or brown belt world champions(which are titles that do not truly embody the concept of a “world champion”).
I realize that the practical consequences of running those tournaments that way would be negative. Far fewer people would compete, and that means the revenue would decrease. But in principle I think they should be run that way.
I would still favor having belt rank divisions for all the other tournaments.
Make sense?
Tags:
Share
Facebook
-
▶ Reply to This