BJPENN COM

MMA News

Monday, 04/30/2012, 08:35 am

Comments

Dana White | If CA Bill Passes No More Fights in California | UFC News


By Lynn Mitchell:

UFC President Dana White makes an expletive stance against the CSAC Bill during his lunch at The Palms West Hollywood with a small group of local MMA writers last Wednesday.

Dana White:

“They are trying to pass this bill to raise our taxes and do a bunch of crazy (expletive) to us. They voted 4-2 for the bill. There were a couple of people not present to vote on it.

If that thing passes we won’t do anymore fights in California.  All kinds of crazy (expletive) they’re trying to throw in this bill for MMA.

You know who’s doing it?

The Culinary Union from Las Vegas.  These guys have been (expletive) with us in New York, too.  That’s why we’re not in New York.

These guys got a bunch of lobbyists together to try to pass this bill against MMA.   They are putting pressure on my partners, the Fertitta brothers, because they own the fourth-largest gaming company in the country and they are non-union.”

Assembly Bill No.  2100

Existing law, the State Athletic Commission Act, creates the State Athletic Commission and makes it responsible for licensing and regulating boxing, kickboxing, and martial arts matches and wrestling exhibitions. Existing law prohibits a promoter from having a proprietary interest in a boxer or mixed martial arts fighter without the approval of the commission. Existing law creates the continuously appropriated Boxers’ Pension Fund and requires the commission to establish a pension plan for boxers and to deposit the moneys collected by the pension plan into the fund.

This bill would require a promoter to provide specified written and sworn statements regarding his or her financial interests to the commission before the promoter can receive compensation from a boxing or mixed martial arts contest. By requiring a statement to be made under penalty of perjury, the bill would expand that crime and would thereby impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also require the commission to revoke or refuse to renew the license of a mixed martial arts promoter who enters into a coercive contract, as defined, with a mixed martial arts fighter, who has been convicted of a felony or a gross misdemeanor, or who has been subject to specified law enforcement actions, investigations, or allegations. This bill would require the commission to establish a professional code of conduct for licensees. This bill would also extend the scope of the Boxers’ Pension Plan to include professional mixed martial arts fighters and would rename the fund as the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund. By providing for new moneys to be deposited in a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.

Section 18649 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:

18649.

(a) The commission shall revoke or refuse to renew the license of any mixed martial arts promoter that enters into a contract with a mixed martial arts fighter in the state ofCaliforniaif the contract contains one or more coercive provisions. A contract provision shall be considered coercive to the extent that it does any of the following:

(1) Assigns any future merchandising rights to a promoter beyond the term of the promotional contract.

(2) Automatically renews the contract or extends the term without good faith, arms-length negotiation.

(3) Grants the promoter a right to match the terms of a competing offer or contract.

(4) Grants the promoter a right to enter into exclusive negotiations with a mixed martial arts fighter.

(5) Restricts a mixed martial arts fighter from sponsoring another firm, product, or individual.

(6) Requires a mixed martial arts fighter to relinquish any legal claims for negligence that the fighter has, or may acquire in the future, against the promoter.

(7) Restricts a mixed martial arts fighter from contracting with another promoter.

(8) Requires a mixed martial arts fighter to forfeit any rights as a condition precedent to the fighter’s participation in a contest.

(b) The commission shall revoke or refuse to renew the license of any promoter if it finds that the promoter, or any person or entity that is a partner, agent, employee, stockholder, or associate of the promoter, has been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude in any jurisdiction; is currently the subject of a state or federal criminal investigation; has been subject to a state or federal tax lien within the past five years; has failed to respond to a subpoena issued by any government agency; has been found to have violated any local, state, or federal law; has been sanctioned by a local, state, or federal judge; or has been credibly alleged to have violated international human rights standards.

(c) To ensure that individuals and entities licensed under this act observe common standards of decency, the commission shall, in consultation with the Association of Boxing Commissioners, establish a professional code of ethical conduct. Notwithstanding any other provision of this code, the commission shall enforce the code of ethical conduct.

SEC. 2.

Section 18849 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

18849.

No promoter, nor any person having a proprietary interest in the promoter, shall have, either directly or indirectly, any proprietary interest in a boxer or martial arts fighter competing on the premises owned, leased, or rented by the promoter without written approval from the commission. No promoter shall be entitled to receive any compensation directly or indirectly in connection with a contest until the promoter provides to the commission the following:

(a) A copy of any agreement in writing to which the promoter is a party with any professional athlete or contestant licensed under this act.

(b) A statement made under penalty of perjury that there are no other agreements, written or oral, between the promoter and the athlete with respect to that contest.

(c) All fees, charges, and expenses that will be assessed by or through the promoter on the athlete participating in the event, including any portion of the athlete’s purse that the promoter will receive.

(d) Any reduction in the athlete’s purse contrary to a previous agreement between the promoter and the athlete.

SEC. 3.

Section 18880 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

18880.

(a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

(1) That professional athletes licensed under this chapter, as a group, for many reasons, do not retain their earnings, and are often injured or destitute, or both, and unable to take proper care of themselves, whether financially or otherwise, and that the enactment of this article is to serve a public purpose by making provisions for a needy group to insure a modicum of financial security for professional athletes.

(2) Athletes licensed under this chapter may suffer extraordinary disabilities in the normal course of their trade. These may include acute and chronic traumatic brain injuries, resulting from multiple concussions as well as from repeated exposure to a large number of subconcussive punches, eye injuries, including retinal tears, holes, and detachments, and other neurological impairments.

(3) The pension plan of the commission is part of the state’s health and safety regulatory scheme, designed to protect boxers and mixed martial arts fighterslicensed under this chapter from the health-related hazards of their trade. The pension plan addresses those health and safety needs, recognizing the disability and health maintenance expenses those needs may require.

(4) The regulatory system ofCaliforniais interrelated with the conduct of the trade in every jurisdiction. Athletes licensed under this chapter participate in contests in other states and many athletes who are based in those other jurisdictions may participate inCaliforniaon a single-event basis.

(5) The outcomes and natures of fights in other jurisdictions are relevant toCaliforniaregulatory jurisdiction and are routinely monitored for health and safety reasons, so that, for example, a knockout of an athlete licensed under this chapter in another jurisdiction is paid appropriate heed with respect to establishing a waiting period before that athlete may commence fighting in California.

(6) The monitoring of other jurisdictions is an integral part of the health and safety ofCaliforniaathletes licensed under this chapter due to the interstate nature of the trade, and therefore the regulatory scheme for contests and athletes under this chapter should reflect this accordingly.

(7) Some mixed martial arts promoters licensed under this chapter engage in certain exploitative, oppressive, and coercive contractual practices that violate athletes’ freedom to work and their ability to support themselves and their families as professional athletes.

(8) It is necessary and appropriate to establish standards to protect the rights and welfare of mixed martial arts fighters licensed under this chapter from unscrupulous promoters and coercive contractual practices.

(b) The provisions of this article pertain only to professional boxers and mixed martial arts fighters licensed under this chapter.

SECTION 1.SEC. 4.

Section 18881 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

18881.

(a) The commission shall, consistent with the purposes of this article, establish a pension plan for professional boxers and professional mixed martial arts fighters who engage in boxing or mixed martial arts contests in this state.

(b) The commission shall, consistent with the purposes of this article, establish the method by which the pension plan will be financed, including those who shall contribute to the financing of the pension plan. The method of financing the pension plan may include, but is not limited to, assessments on tickets and contributions by boxers, mixed martial arts fighters, managers, promoters, or any one or more of these persons, in an amount sufficient to finance the pension plan. Any promoter that receives a fee for televising a boxing or mixed martial arts contest performed in the State of California on a pay-per-view or network telecast shall pay 5 percent of the gross receipts from the telecast, exclusive of federal, state, or local taxes, into the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund. For purposes of this section, the term “sufficient” means that the annual contributions shall be calculated to achieve no less than the average level of annual aggregate pension plan contributions from all sources for the period from July 1, 1981, through December 31, 1994, and adjusted thereafter to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for California as set forth by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

(c) Any pension plan established by the commission shall be actuarially sound.

SEC. 2.SEC. 5.

Section 18882 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

18882.

(a) At the time of payment of the fee required by Section 18824, a promoter shall pay to the commission all amounts scheduled for contribution to the pension plan. If the commission, in its discretion, requires pursuant to Section 18881, that contributions to the pension plan be made by the boxer or mixed martial arts fighter and his or her manager, those contributions shall be made at the time and in the manner prescribed by the commission.

(b) The Boxers’ Pension Fund is hereby continued in existence and renamed as the Boxers’ and Mixed Marital Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund. All contributions to finance the pension plan shall be deposited in the State Treasury and credited to the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund, which is hereby created. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 13340 of the Government Code, all moneys in the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund are hereby continuously appropriated to be used exclusively for the purposes and administration of the pension plan.

(c) The Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund is a retirement fund, and no moneys within it shall be deposited or transferred to the General Fund.

(d) The commission has exclusive control of all funds in the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund. No transfer or disbursement in any amount from this fund shall be made except upon the authorization of the commission and for the purpose and administration of the pension plan.

(e) Except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, the commission or its designee shall invest the money contained in the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund according to the same standard of care as provided in Section 16040 of the Probate Code. The commission has exclusive control over the investment of all moneys in the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund. Except as otherwise prohibited or restricted by law, the commission may invest the moneys in the fund through the purchase, holding, or sale of any investment, financial instrument, or financial transaction that the commission in its informed opinion determines is prudent.

(f) The administrative costs associated with investing, managing, and distributing the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund shall be limited to no more than 20 percent of the average annual contribution made to the fund in the previous two years, not including any investment income derived from the corpus of the fund. Diligence shall be exercised by administrators in order to lower the fund’s expense ratio as far below 20 percent as feasible and appropriate. The commission shall report to the Joint Committee on Boards, Commissions, and Consumer Protection on the impact of this provision during the next regularly scheduled sunset review after January 1, 2007.

SEC. 3.SEC. 6.

Section 18884 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

18884.

(a) A promoter may, but is not required to, add to the price of each ticket sold for a professional boxing or professional mixed martial arts contest, an amount specifically designated on the ticket for contribution as a donation, either or both, to the pension plan established pursuant to Section 18881. The additional amount shall not be subject to the admissions tax required by Section 18824 or any other deductions. Nothing in this section shall authorize the addition of such amounts to less than all the tickets sold for the professional boxing or professional mixed martial arts contest involved. The promoter shall pay additional contributions collected in accordance with Section 18881.

(b) Any additional contributions received pursuant to this section shall not be considered to offset any of the contributions required by the commission under Section 18881.

SEC. 4.SEC. 7.

Section 18887 of the Business and Professions Code is amended to read:

18887.

In addition to any other form in which retirement benefits may be distributed under the pension plan, the commission may, in its discretion, award to a covered boxer or a covered mixed martial arts fighter, a medical early retirement benefit in the amount contained in the covered boxer’s or covered mixed martial arts fighter’s pension plan account at the time the commission makes this award and in the manner provided in the regulations governing the boxers’and mixed martial arts fighters’ pension plan. This benefit shall be in lieu of a pension.

SEC. 8.

No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.

All this legal jargon and mumbo jumbo aside.  The bottom line is….

 “If that thing passes we won’t do anymore fights in California.”  Dana White


comments

26 Comments to Dana White | If CA Bill Passes No More Fights in California | UFC News

  1. RFK says:

    That is some bullshit we wanna keep the fights in Cali the Diaz Daley fight in San Diego was beast don’t punish Cali

    • danielrchargers says:

      damn that sucks. no more Live fights for me… or anyone else from Cali… looks like im road trippin to Nevada alot.

    • Ninja Oreo Dollop says:

      So many fighters have home in CA. Rampage, Wanderlei, Anderson Silva… All of AKA, KOS, Fitch. I’m sure I forgot a bunch. Pretty much a good chunk of Strikeforce.

    • GET RID OF FITCH (forever) says:

      This is just another thing that shows how much control Dana white has behind the scenes. he always talks about how everything is up to the commissions and he abides by all their rules. BULLSHIT if they do anything he doesn’t approve of he just boycotts them and gets his way. No’p sorry cali fans you will be the real loser if this bill passes. I bet you on e of the only FELONS in UFC is Cheat Sonnen. dana doesn’t want any part of having to put money in a fund for retired fighters and #1 would really piss him off because it is the EXACT reason Fitch got released in 2007 when he didn’t want to sign away his lifetime rights to UFC-Dana on his merchandising. No cali will never beat Dana no matter how hard they try. dana rules the MMA world. You are either with him or you are against him just ask Jon fitch. As much as I absolutely can’t stand Fitch style-stalling out decsions i do respect him for trying to stand up to dana a few years ago which almost cost him his job and despite what Dana says he has never liked Fitch since. However part of that is dana says Fitch is overpaid and ruins-stinks up his fight cards so you can only falt dana for part of that bad realtionship between employer and employee.

      • Turkeykneck fun chav says:

        you spend too much time on here now, you use to make valid points but overtime you have surcome to believing your own bullshit.

        its not about dana white having control, its about it negetively affecting the MMA model and allowing the bill to pass wil damage mma in this area.

        by boycotting CA it raises an issue and hopefully people will stand ground. before Dana mentioned it fighters like Rhonda, Nate, etc have gone against supporting the bill and believe it has a negetive influence on MMA. which it will.

        you can whine and Bitch about Dana all you want facts are this.
        No other promotion in the US/UK pays as well as UFC.
        No other promotion in the Western world carries as much weight as the UFC for MMA.
        UFC IS the biggest MMA organisation with a large catalogue of fighters.
        If you are an MMA fan you watch UFC and UFC’s survival is important for MMA to exist in the long term.

        you waste your time moaning and going into all the conspiracy bullshit about Dana, it wont change anything and wont help.

        If you are honestly telling me you are a supporter of this bill you are a retard.
        if every state was to impose this then UFC would only just survive and every other small scale MMA promotion would be flattened and cease to exist as they couldnt afford the costs.

        want a world with no mma? nice one

  2. Mr Groove says:

    First CA and it’s dumb gun laws and now they’re trying to restrict more on MMA? Not good.

  3. Mr Groove says:

    First CA gun laws are one of the shittiest in the country and now they’re taxing and restricting more on MMA? No bueno.

  4. jbeamazing says:

    good fuck em maybe Michigan can get some love mma is huge here

  5. Bobby says:

    Thats what happens when money rules the world and not common sense.

  6. “expletive” is a noun, not an adjective

    • Dinglenuts Magee says:

      Go “expletive” yourself – verb

      Eat “expletive” – noun

      Look at that “Expletive’s” face, he got “expletive” up – pronoun, verb

      This car drives “expletive” fast – adverb

      The Colts are a “expletive” team without Peyton – ADJECTIVE

      “Expletive!” I left my weed in the car. – interjection

  7. hm says:

    Well at least you guys still have medicinal marijuana…

  8. Thurgood Jenkins says:

    I only read 18469, but it seems like that provision is only effective if the promoter enters into a contract with the fighter IN Cali. I guess contract elsewhere, and it’s not applicable.

  9. Shawn says:

    If this bill passes, there are plenty of other States to promote fights. And really, in the end it’s California that loses out on revenue they can and have made through UFC events. Just another instance of greedy bureaucrats and their lackies.

  10. Jebus says:

    They only wanna make the ufc sign on the pension plan for the boxers and mma fighters so they can invest the money freely on anything that they “think” is profitable and doing that they will take a fee for the work done. All this text and this is the true reason for them to try pushing this. Read below urselves:
    (f) The administrative costs associated with investing, managing, and distributing the Boxers’ and Mixed Martial Arts Fighters’ Pension Fund shall be limited to no more than 20 percent of the average annual contribution made to the fund in the previous two years, not including any investment income derived from the corpus of the fund. Diligence shall be exercised by administrators in order to lower the fund’s expense ratio as far below 20 percent as feasible and appropriate. The commission shall report to the Joint Committee on Boards, Commissions, and Consumer Protection on the impact of this provision during the next regularly scheduled sunset review after January 1, 2007.

  11. James says:

    Not letting criminals fight is messed up. There have been some great tales of redemption involving fighters with a murky past.

    • Ninja Oreo Dollop says:

      I feel the same way. Who are they to discriminate against a person who would otherwise have a rough time finding a job anyways?

      • James says:

        Totally. It’s not like the felons are snatching all the pro fighting gigs out of the hungry mouths of law abiding folk.

        • Ninja Oreo Dollop says:

          Most felons deserve a chance at redemption, this lawmaking is stupid.

        • Xaninho says:

          True, ex-criminals will become criminals again. Many of those guys have mouths to feed.

        • GET RID OF FITCH (forever) says:

          Dana just pissed because what Cali did to his boy Cheat Sonnen. Damn he’s a bigtime felon to isn’t he

  12. Brend0magic says:

    That’s some serious bullshit for Californian MMA fans.

  13. oliver says:

    Nobody’s proofreading or reviewing these articles before they are submitted are they? Jargen? Jargon…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>