1/2 Point Rule and Changes To The Unified Rules Of MMA 3 month delay | Association of Boxing Commission
The 2012 Association of Boxing Commission convention in Clearwater, FL the ABC voted not to implement the he half-point system. It was also decided to wait an additional 90 days on the changes in the recommended Unified Rules judging criteria. During the 90 days, further public comment and feeback from stakeholders in the industry will be explored.
1. Effective Defense Removed as a criteria
2. Striking and Grappling are now considered to be given equal weight.
3. “Damage” is as a term has been used a descriptor when discussing the scoring of MMA rounds by officials. This terminology be replaced by the term “effective”
judged by determining the impact of legal strikes landed by a contestant and the number of such legal strikes. Heavier strikes that have a visible impact on the opponent will be given more weight than the number of strikes landed. These assessments include causing an opponent to appear stunned from a legal blow, causing the opponent to stagger, appearance of a cut or bruise from a legal strike and causing the opponent to show pain. Cumulative impact on a fighter will also be weighed. If neither fighter shows an advantage in impact of strikes, the number of strikes will determine the most effective striker.
judged by considering the amount of successful executions of a legal takedown, reversals and submission attempts. Examples of factors to consider are take downs from standing position to mount position, passing the guard to a dominant position, and bottom position fighters using an active, threatening guard to create submission attempts. Submission attempts which come close to ending a fight will be weighted more highly than attempts which are easily defended. Submission attempts which cause an opponent to weaken or tire from the effort required to defend the technique will also be weighted highly in scoring. High amplitude takedowns and throws which have great impact will be scored more heavily than a takedown which does not have great impact.
moving forward scoring with a legal technique or attacking from the guard with threatening submissions.
dictating the pace, place and position of the fight
“All mixed martial arts bouts will be evaluated and scored by three judges. The 10-Point Must System will be the standard system of scoring a bout. Under the 10-Point Must Scoring System, 10 points must be awarded to the winner of the round and nine points or less must be awarded to the loser, except for an even round, which is scored (10-10)”
The 10-Point Must System will be the standard system of scoring a bout. Under the 10-Point Must Scoring System, 10 points must be awarded to the winner of the round and nine points or less must be awarded to the loser, except for an even round, which is scored (10-10).
1. A round is to be scored as a 10-10 Round when both contestants appear to be fighting evenly and neither contestant shows superiority by even a close margin. This score should rarely be used.
2. A round is to be scored as a 10-9 Round when a contestant wins by a close margin, landing the greater number of effective legal strikes, demonstrating effective grappling, and utilizing other effective legal techniques.
3. A round is to be scored as a 10-8 Round when a contestant wins by a large margin, by effective striking and or effective grappling that have great impact on the opponent.
4. A round is to be scored as a 10-7 Round when a contestant totally dominates by effective striking and or effective grappling, which put the opponent in great danger throughout the round. In a 10-7 round referee stoppage may be eminent. This score should rarely be used.
Let your voices be heard PENN Nation. Give us your thoughts on the Unified Rules of MMA – Judging Criteria Amended July 2012
Read more: MMA(News)
8 Responses to “1/2 Point Rule and Changes To The Unified Rules Of MMA 3 month delay | Association of Boxing Commission”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.